Effect of Adding Luteolin Nanoparticles on the Antibacterial and Mechanical Properties of an Orthodontic Adhesive

Section: Research Paper

Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding Luteolin nanoparticles in two different concentrations (1% and 3%) on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of the Transbond XT Unitek Orthodontic Adhesive. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted human upper premolar teeth were used for the shear bond strength test (SBS). The teeth were randomly divided into three groups, ten teeth each: Control group, Luteolin 1% and Luteolin 3% Nanoparticles (NPs) groups. The mesh of the brackets was covered with transbond or modified adhesives, which were then adhered to the teeth. The brackets were debonded using a universal testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index was checked using a stereomicroscope at a 10X magnification. Thirty composite discs were used for the antibacterial test. ten discs were made from transbond adhesive as a control group, and twenty discs (divided equally) were prepared from orthodontic adhesive modified by incorporating Luteolin 1% and Luteolin 3% nanoparticles. The adhesives antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus was determined by the disk diffusion technique. Statistical analysis was done at P >0.05. Results: The Control group's shear bond strength was statistically higher than that of the other groups (16.1 MPa for the control group and 12.9 MPa, 10.8 MPa for luteolin 1% and Luteolin 3%, respectively). However, the SBS results of this study demonstrated that the mean of all groups was more than that recommended by Reynolds (5.9-7.8 MPa) in (1975). The disc diffusion method showed that 3% luteolin modified adhesive was more effective than luteolin 1% and the control groups, with a larger bacterial inhibition zone. Conclusions: The incorporation of Luteolin NPs in orthodontic resin produced an antibacterial effect againstStreptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus without compromising the shear bond strength.

References

  1. 1. Dab S, Chen K, Flores‐Mir C. Short‐and long‐term potential effects of accelerated osteogenic orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Orthodontics & craniofacial research. 2019 May;22(2):61-8.
  2. 2. Poornima P, Krithikadatta J, Ponraj RR, Velmurugan N, Kishen A. Biofilm formation following chitosan-based varnish or chlorhexidine-fluoride varnish application in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment: a double blinded randomised controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec;21:1-0.
  3. 3. Mosaddad SA, Yazdanian M, Tebyanian H, Tahmasebi E, Yazdanian A, Seifalian A, Tavakolizadeh M. Fabrication and properties of developed collagen/strontium-doped Bioglass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2020 Nov 1;9(6):14799-817.
  4. 4. Moghadam ET, Yazdanian M, Tahmasebi E, Tebyanian H, Ranjbar R, Yazdanian A, Seifalian A, Tafazoli A. Current herbal medicine as an alternative treatment in dentistry: In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. European journal of pharmacology. 2020 Dec 15;889:173665.
  5. 5. Tebyanian H, Karami A, Motavallian E, Aslani J, Samadikuchaksaraei A, Arjmand B, Nourani MR. Histologic analyses of different concentrations of TritonX-100 and Sodium dodecyl sulfate detergent in lung decellularization. Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2017 Aug 15;63(7):46-51.
  6. 6. Song W, Ge S. Application of antimicrobial nanoparticles in dentistry. Molecules. 2019 Mar 15;24(6):1033.
  7. 7. Pourhajibagher M, Sodagar A, Bahador A. An in vitro evaluation of the effects of nanoparticles on shear bond strength and antimicrobial properties of orthodontic adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. International Orthodontics. 2020 Jun 1;18(2):203-13.
  8. 8. Martelli G, Giacomini D. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities for natural and synthetic dual-active compounds. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018 Oct 5;158:91-105.
  9. 9. Sodagar A, Akhavan A, Arab S, Bahador A, Pourhajibagher M, Soudi A. Evaluation of the effect of propolis nanoparticles on antimicrobial properties and shear bond strength of orthodontic composite bonded to bovine enamel. Frontiers in dentistry. 2019 Mar;16(2):96.
  10. 10. EL-Awady AA, Al-Khalifa HN, Mohamed RE, Ali MM, Abdallah KF, Hosny MM, Mohamed AA, ElHabbak KS, Hussein FA. Shear Bond Strength and Antibacterial Efficacy of Cinnamon and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Incorporated Experimental Orthodontic Adhesive—An In Vitro Comparative Study. Applied Sciences. 2023 May 21;13(10):6294.
  11. 11. Sodagar A, Akhavan A, Hashemi E, Arab S, Pourhajibagher M, Sodagar K, Kharrazifard MJ, Bahador A. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of a conventional orthodontic composite containing silver/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Progress in orthodontics. 2016 Dec;17(1):1-7.
  12. 12. Aziz N, Kim MY, Cho JY. Anti-inflammatory effects of luteolin: A review of in vitro, in vivo, and in silico studies. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2018 Oct 28;225:342-58.
  13. 13. Zhang HX, Chen Y, Xu R, He QY. Nrf2 mediates the resistance of human A549 and HepG2 cancer cells to boningmycin, a new antitumor antibiotic, in vitro through regulation of glutathione levels. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2018 Oct;39(10):1661-9.
  14. 14. Sodagar A, Akhoundi MS, Bahador A, Jalali YF, Behzadi Z, Elhaminejad F, Mirhashemi AH. Effect of TiO 2 nanoparticles incorporation on antibacterial properties and shear bond strength of dental composite used in Orthodontics. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2017 Sep;22:67-74.
  15. 15. Rodrigues-Tonetto M, Alves de Campos E, Fernández E, Carlos Kuga M, Ferrarezi de Andrade M, Coelho-Bandéca M. Bond strength and adhesive remnant index of experimental brackets bonded with self-adhesive resin cement. Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral. 2017 Aug;10(2):115-7.
  16. 16. Sharma S, Tandon P, Nagar A, Singh GP, Singh A, Chugh VK. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives. Journal of orthodontic science. 2014 Apr;3(2):29.
  17. 17. Olmez S, Dogan S. Comparison of the arch forms and dimensions in various malocclusions of the Turkish population. Open Journal of Stomatology. 2011 Dec 7;1(04):158.
  18. 18. Wendle B.and Droshl H. Acopmaritive invitro study of the directly bonded brackets using different curing techniques. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 535-545.
  19. 19. Zhang Z, Jones MM, Sabatini C, Vanyo ST, Yang M, Kumar A, Jiang Y, Swihart MT, Visser MB, Cheng C. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of polymer–antibiotic conjugates incorporated into a resin-based dental adhesive. Biomaterials science. 2021;9(6):2043-52.
  20. 20. Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. American society for microbiology. 2009 Dec 8;15:55-63.
  21. 21. Eltayeb MK, Ibrahim YE, El Karim IA, Sanhouri NM. Distribution of white spot lesions among orthodontic patients attending teaching institutes in Khartoum. BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec;17:1-6.
  22. 22. Nakashima S, Yoshie M, Sano H, Bahar A. Effect of a test dentifrice containing nano-sized calcium carbonate on remineralization of enamel lesions in vitro. Journal of oral science. 2009;51(1):69-77.
  23. 23. Ahmadi H, Haddadi-Asl V, Ghafari HA, Ghorbanzadeh R, Mazlum Y, Bahador A. Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and anti-biofilm effects of a photoexcited modified orthodontic adhesive containing curcumin doped poly lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles: An ex-vivo biofilm model of S. mutans on the enamel slab bonded brackets. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2020 Jun 1;30:101674.
  24. 24. Yaseen SN, Taqa AA, Al-Khatib AR. The effect of incorporation Nano Cinnamon powder on the shear bond of the orthodontic composite (an in vitro study). Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2020 Apr 1;10(2):128-34.
  25. 25. Poosti M, Ramazanzadeh B, Zebarjad M, Javadzadeh P, Naderinasab M, Shakeri MT. Shear bond strength and antibacterial effects of orthodontic composite containing TiO2 nanoparticles. European journal of orthodontics. 2013 Oct 1;35(5):676-9.
Download this PDF file
##submission.supplementaryFiles##

Statistics

Copyright and Licensing