Bond Strength of Silicon-Based Soft Liner Cured in Microwave to Three Types of Denture Base Materials

Section: Research Paper
Issue
Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): Volume 26 Issue 1
Pages
166-187

Keywords:

Conventional, 3-D, CAD-CAM, Er;Cr:YSGG, Silicone based soft liner

Abstract

Aims: The present study aimed to assess the tensile bond strength (TBS) of three types of denture base materials fabricated by the conventional heat curing technique, three-dimensional printing (3D) and computer-aided design computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) milling technology, bonded to microwave cured silicon base soft liner, and to evaluate the effect of surface treatment (acetone and laser) on the TBS. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 specimens, divided into three groups according to denture base type (Conventional, 3D and CAD-CAM), 30 specimens in each group, then subdivided into three subgroups according to the surface treatment (untreated, acetone and erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium and garnet Er; Cr: YSGG laser), 10 specimens in each subgroup, the denture base materials were bonded to microwave cured silicone-based soft liner (DETAX Germany). TBS was tested using a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was tested by the stereomicroscope. The study results were statistically analyzed using the SPSS program Version 26, using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test at P ≤ 0.05. Results: The CAD-CAM denture base showed a statistically significant increase in TBS value at p ≤ 0.05 (1.88±0.135), whereas the 3D type denture base showed a lower TBS (0.93±0.058). The surface treatment with Er; Cr: YSGG laser (1.699±0.13) followed by acetone (1.378±0.06), respectively, showed a highly significant increase in TBS value, p ≤ 0.05. Conclusion: The CAD-CAM denture base demonstrated the highest TBS compared to the other types of denture base materials. The use of Er; Cr: YSGG laser and acetone, respectively, improves TBS.

References

  1. Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: Literature review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117: 478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.017.
  2. Awad AN, Cho SH, Kesterke MJ, Chen JH. Comparison of tensile bond strength of denture reline materials on denture bases fabricated with CAD-CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2023; 129(4):616-622. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.047.
  3. Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive manufacturing techniques in prosthodontics: Where do we currently stand, A critical review. Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30:474-84. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5079.
  4. Alshakaki HS, Al-Essa HA. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between self-cured resilient liner and denture base resin with different surface treatments. Int J App Dent Sci. 2020; 6(3):684-687. doi.org/10.22271/oral.2020.v6.i3j.1026
  5. Kreve S, Dos Reis AC. Denture Liners: A Systematic Review Relative to Adhesion and Mechanical Properties. The Scientific World Journal. 2019; 3(1),1-11. doi: 10.1155/2019/6913080.
  6. Ozkir SE, Yilmaz B, Unal SM, Culhaoglu A, Kurkcuoglu I. Effect of heat polymerization conditions and microwave on the flexural strength of polymethyl methacrylate. Eur J Dent. 2018; 12(1):116-119.
  7. Fatah SH, Hasan RH. Evaluation of Bond Strength and Dimensional Accuracy of Soft Liner to Microwave Cured Denture Base Material. Polytechnic J. 2020; 10(2).
  8. Skinner EW, Philips RW. Skinner's Science of dental materials. 8th ed. Ralph W. Saunders; Elsevier; 1982.
  9. Ozdemir H, OzdoAan A. Bond Strength of Resilient Lining Materials to Denture Base Resin a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2018; 27(9), 828–841. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12958.
  10. Cavalcanti YW, Bertolini MM, Del Bel Cury AA, Da Silva WJ. The effect of poly (methyl methacrylate) surface treatments on the adhesion of silicone-based resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(6):1539–1544.
  11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.031.
  12. Azpiazu Flores FX, Schricker SR, Seghi RR. Johnston WM. The Effect of Thermocycling on the Adhesive Strength of Three Long-Term Resilient Liners to Dental Polymers Used for the Additive, Subtractive and Formative Manufacture of Complete Dentures, Master's thesis: Ohio State University; 2021. p. 25-40.
  13. Mohamed MD. Comparison of bond strength between acrylic based soft liner and two diffrent denture base (3D printed and conventional denture base. Egypt Dent J. 2022; 68(1): 659-663. doi: 10.21608/EDJ.2021.94616.1784
  14. ASTM D412-16. Standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers-tension. 2016; p: 1-14.
  15. Zeidan AA, El-Rahim RA, El-hakim AF, Harby NM, Helal MA. Evaluation of surface properties and elastic modulus of CAD-CAM milled and 3D printed denture base resins: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022; 12(6):630-637. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_158_22.
  16. Fawzy A, Adbelrahim R, Hameed BA. Assessment of hardness, flexural modulus, and bond strength of acrylic denture base fabricated by 3D digital method. Egyp Dent J. 2021; 67(3):2559-2566. doi: 10.21608/edj.2021.76665.1640
  17. Vásquez-Niño AF, Ochoa-Alzate JR, Osorio-Amariles D, Rodríguez-Quiró s HA. Denture base polymers for analog and digital manufacturing: comparative study of the flexural strength, elastic modulus, and compressive strength of their mechanical properties. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2021;33(1): 6-16.
  18. Jain S, Sayed M, Ahmed WM, Halawi AHA, Najmi NMA, Aggarwal A, Bhandi S, Patil S. An In-Vitro Study to Evaluate the Effect of Denture Cleansing Agents on Color Stability of Denture Bases Fabricated Using CAD/CAM Milling, 3D-Printing and ConventionalTechniques. Biomaterials. 2021; 11(8):962. doi.org/10.3390/coatings11080962.
  19. Al-dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. A Comparison of the Flexural and Impact Strengths and Flexural Modulus of CAD/CAM and Conventional Heat-Cured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodont. 2020; 29(4):341-349. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12926.
  20. Surapaneni H, Ariga P, Haribabu R, Ravi Shankar Y, Kumar VH, Attili S. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength between silicon soft liners and processed denture base resin conditioned by three modes of surface treatment: an invitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013; 13(3);274-80. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0235-5.
  21. Korkmaz FM, Bagis B, Özcan M, Durkan R, Turgut S, Ates SM. Peel strength of denture liner to PMMA and polyamide: laser versus air-abrasion. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5(3):287–95. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.287.
  22. Ramakrishnan H, Varun S, Mahadevan V, Jayakrishnakumar S, Azhagarasa S. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength between Silicone Soft Liner and Denture Base Resin – A Three Dimensional Study. J Dent and Med Sci. 2019; 18(11): 24-34. doi: 10.9790/0853-1811012434
  23. ISO/TS. 11405. International Standardization Organization. Specification for dental materials. Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland. 2003.
  24. Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 14th ed. China: ELSVIER; 2019. p. 82-95.
  25. Taşın S, Ismatullaev A, Usumez A. Comparison of Surface Roughness and Color Stainability of 3-Dimensionally Printed Interim Prosthodontic Material with Conventionally Fabricated and CAD-CAM Milled Materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128(5):1094–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.027.
  26. Song SY, Shin YH, Lee JY, Shi SW. Color stability of provisional restorative materials with different fabrication methods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020; 12(5):259–264. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.259.
  27. Prpic V. Schauperl Z. Catic A. Dulcic N. Cimic S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2020; 29(6):524–528. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13175.
  28. Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111:351-355. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.014.
  29. Vayrynen VO, Tanner J, Vallittu PK. The anisotropicity of the flexural properties of an occlusal device material processed by stereolithography. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116:811-817. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.018.
  30. Unkovskiy A, Bui PH, Schille C, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Huettig F, Spintzyk S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereo-lithographically printed resin. Dent Mater. 2018; 34:324–33. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.011.
  31. Vuksic J, Pilipovic A, Pericic TP, Kranjicic j. Tensile Bond Strength between Different Denture Base Materials and Soft Denture Liners. Materials, 2023; 16(13):4615. doi: 10.3390/ma16134615.
  32. Wemken G, Burkhardt F, Spies BC, Kleinvogel L, Adali U, Sterzenbach G, Beuer F, Wesemann C. Bond Strength of Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Manufactured Denture Bases to Soft and Hard Relining Materials. Dent Mater. 2021; 37:928–938. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.02.018.
  33. Choi JE, Ng TE, Leong CK, Kim H, Li P, Waddell JN. Adhesive Evaluation of Three Types of Resilient Denture Liners Bonded to Heat-Polymerized, Auto-polymerized, or Cad-Cam Acrylic Resin Denture Bases. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120(5):699–705. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.032.
  34. Muddugangadhar BC, Mawani DP, Das A, Mukhopadhyay A. Bond strength of soft liners to denture base resins and the influence of different surface treatments and thermocycling: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123(6):800–806. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.013.
  35. Kreve S, Andrea C, Dos Reis. Denture Liners: A Systematic Review Relative to Adhesion and Mechanical Properties. The Scientific World Journal. 2019; 11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1155/2019/6913080.
  36. Osathananda R, Wiwatwarrapan C. Surface treatment with methyl formate-methyl acetate increased the shear bond strength between reline resins and denture base resin. Gerodontology. 2016; 33(2):147–154, 2016. doi: 10.1111/ger.12120.
  37. Akin H, Tugut F, Mutaf B, Guney U. Investigation of bonding properties of denture bases to silicone-based soft denture liner immersed in isobutyl methacrylate and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6(2):121-5. 34. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.121.
  38. Yildirim AZ, Unver S, Mese A, Bayram C, Denkbas EB, Cevik P. Effect of argon plasma and Er:YAG laser on tensile bond strength between denture liner and acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124(6):799. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.009.
  39. Gundogdu M, Yesil Duymus Z, Alkurt M. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of soft denture lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:964-71. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.017.
  40. Nakhaei M, Dashti H, Ahrari F, Vasigh S, Mushtaq S, Shetty RM. Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Thermocycling on Bond Strength of a Silicone-based Denture Liner to a Denture Base Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(2):154-159.

Authors

Israa Ali Mahmood

Ministry of Health, Ninevah Health Directorate, Mosul, Iraq

Radhwan H. Hasan

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

Identifiers

DOI: 10.33899/rdentj.v26i1.60516

Download this PDF file
##submission.supplementaryFiles##
pdf

Statistics

Copyright and Licensing
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.