3D Printed Try-in for Complex Ceramic Veneers: A Systematic Review

Section: Review Paper
Issue
Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026): Volume 26 Issue 2
Pages
296-326

Abstract

Aims: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness, clinical outcomes, material performance, patient satisfaction, and technological limitations associated with 3D-printed try-ins for complex ceramic veneers.


Data Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar covering publications from January 2010 to September 2025.


Study Eligibility Criteria: Peer-reviewed studies assessing 3D-printed try-ins within ceramic veneer workflows were included. Eligible designs comprised clinical trials, experimental studies, observational studies, and systematic reviews reporting quantitative or qualitative outcomes. Case reports, editorials, non-English articles, and studies unrelated to ceramic veneers or try-in fabrication were excluded.


Materials and Methods: This review examines its impact on clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and technological limitations. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 2010 to 2025 identified 2,173 records, of which 19 studies met the inclusion criteria following PRISMA guidelines. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, digital workflows, material properties, clinical outcomes, and technological considerations


Results: Most included studies were published after 2020 and originated primarily from Europe and Asia, with significant contributions from the United States. The studies showed significant differences in the properties of test materials between 3D-printed try-ins and conventional mock-ups. The 3D-printed try-ins had 25-55% greater tensile and compression strength, and flexural strength was increased by 70-100%. They also demonstrated superior fatigue resistance, volumetric stability, and cell proliferation. Overall, 3D printing improved precision, durability, and patient satisfaction, though material standardization and long-term validation remain necessary.


Conclusion:  3D-printed try-ins provide improved mechanical performance, precision, and clinical workflow efficiency in complex ceramic veneer procedures compared with conventional techniques. Despite promising outcomes, standardized materials, optimized printing protocols, and long-term clinical validation are necessary to support broader clinical adoption

Keywords:

3D Printing, ceramic veneers, digital dentistry, CAD/CAM, provisional restoration, restorative dentistry

References

  1. Beefathimathul H. Precision and Customization: The Role of 3D Printing in Modern Prosthodontics.EurJDent.2025;19(3):580–6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12182399/
  2. Suganna M, Kausher H, Tarek Ahmed S, Sultan Alharbi H, Faraj Alsubaie B, DS A, et al. Contemporary Evidence of CAD-CAM in Dentistry: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022;14(11):1-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36561580/
  3. Tribst JPM, Pereira GKR, Kleverlaan CJ. Advancements in Dental Care: The Evolving Landscape of Prosthetic Dentistry. J Clin Med. 2024;13(5):1-4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10932426/
  4. Yeslam HE, von Maltzahn NF, Nassar HM. Revolutionizing CAD/CAM-based restorative dental processes and materials with artificial intelligence: a concise narrativereview.PeerJ.2024;12(7):e17793. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11262301/
  5. CDA. Comparison between conventional and digital diagnostic wax-ups in the aesthetic and functional predictability of dental prostheses. Revista CPAQV. 2025;17(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.36692/V17N1-86R
  6. Rezaie F, Farshbaf M, Dahri M, Masjedi M, Maleki R, Amini F, et al. 3D Printing of Dental Prostheses: Current and Emerging Applications. J Compos Sci. 2023;7(2):1-24. https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/7/2/80/htm
  7. Anadioti E, Musharbash L, Blatz MB, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P. 3D printed complete removable dental prostheses: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01328-8
  8. Jun MK, Kim JW, Ku HM. Three-Dimensional Printing in Dentistry: A Scoping Review of Clinical Applications, Advantages, and Current Limitations. Oral. 2025;5(2):1-26. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6373/5/2/24/htm
  9. Chen Y, Wei J. Application of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(7):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17070886
  10. Kharat S, Dudhani SI, Kouser A, Subramanian P, Bhattacharjee D, Jhamb V. Exploring the Impact of 3D Printing Technology on Patient-Specific Prosthodontic Rehabilitation: A Comparative Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S423. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11001056/
  11. Yüceer czge M, Kaynak Öztürk E, Çiçek ES, Aktaş N, Bankoğlu Güngör M. Three-Dimensional-Printed Photopolymer Resin Materials: A Narrative Review on Their Production Techniques and Applications in Dentistry. Polymers. 2025;17(3):1-30. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/17/3/316/htm
  12. Duarte S, Phark JH. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D‐Printed Ceramic‐Reinforced Composites. Journal of Esthetic and RestorativeDentistry.2024;37(1):1-20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11913211/
  13. AhmedS, HawsahA, RustomR, AlamriA, AlthomairyS, AleneziM, et al. Digital Impressions Versus Conventional Impressions in Prosthodontics: A systematic Review.Cureus.2024;16(1): e51537. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10834103/
  14. Gawali N, Shah PP, Gowdar IM, Bhavsar KA, Giri D, Laddha R. The Evolution of Digital Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S1920. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426768/
  15. Bhatt S, Simre SS, Patadiya HH, Yadav D, Deepti B, Sathvi SS, Manamasa Y. 3D printing in dentistry: A review. JAMDSR. 2025;13(1):11-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389888083_Review_Article_3D_Printing_in_Dentistry_A_Review
  16. Jeong M;, Radomski K;, Lopez D;, Liu JT;, Lee JD;, Lee SJ, et al. Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview. Dentistry Journal 2024, Vol 12, Page 1. 2023;12(1):1-15. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/12/1/1/htm
  17. Bojko Ł, Ryniewicz AM, Ryniewicz W. Strength Tests of Alloys for Fixed Structures in Dental Prosthetics. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(10):1-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35629529/
  18. Derksen W, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. Randomized Clinical Trial comparing clinical adjustment times of CAD/CAM screw-retained posterior crowns on ti-base abutments created with digital or conventional impressions. One-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(8):962–70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34080238/
  19. Hassan B, Greven M, Wismeijer D. Integrating 3D facial scanning in a digital workflow to CAD/CAM design and fabricate complete dentures for immediate total mouth rehabilitation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(5):381–6. https://lens.org/048-748-934-066-911
  20. Tsuji Y, Hiraishi N, Ikeda M, Uo M, Tsuchida Y, Ushijima K, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties and ion-releasing of 3D printing resins containing S-PRG filler: A preliminary study. Dent Mater J. 2025;44(1):34-40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39631951/
  21. Alhallak K, Hagi-Pavli E, Nankali A. A review on clinical use of CAD/CAM and 3D printed dentures. British Dental Journal 2023. 2023;(2023)1–5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-022-5401-5
  22. Czigola A, Abram E, Kovacs ZI, Marton K, Hermann P, Borbely J. Effects of substrate, ceramic thickness, translucency, and cement shade on the color of CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):457–64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30957412/
  23. Pilecco RO, Machry RV, Ribeiro VF, Dal Piva AM de O, Tribst JPM, Kleverlaan CJ, et al. Impact of try-in paste removal on the fatigue behavior of bonded lithium disilicate ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;151(2024):1-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38218045/
  24. Mancuso E, Gasperini T, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Forte A, et al. The influence of finishing line and luting material selection on the seating accuracy of CAD/CAM indirect composite restorations. J Dent. 2024;148(2024):1-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39043328/
  25. Mühlemann S, Lamperti ST, Stucki L, Hämmerle CHF, Thoma DS. Time efficiency and efficacy of a centralized computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing workflow for implant crown fabrication: A prospective controlled clinical study. J Dent. 2022;127(2022):1-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36252858/
  26. Porojan L, Vasiliu RD, Porojan SD. Masking Abilities of Dental Cad/Cam Resin Composite Materials Related to Substrate and Luting Material. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(3):364-364. https://lens.org/027-585-065-624-68X
  27. Jeong KW, Kim SH. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(2):95–104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31080570/
  28. Yeslam HE, Alharbi S, Albalawi W, Hasanain FA. The effect of thermal aging on flexural strength of CAD/CAM hybrid and polymeric materials. Mater Res Express. 2023;10(9):1-14. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1591/acfae9
  29. Jensen E, Sayardoust S. Evaluation of Internal Fit in Custom-Made Posts and Cores Fabricated with Fully Digital Versus Conventional Techniques. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15(12):1-10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39728189/
  30. Espinar C, Bona A Della, Pérez MM, Tejada-Casado M, Pulgar R. The influence of printing angle on color and translucency of 3D printed resins for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2023;39(4):410–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36914433/
  31. Lee HJ, Jeong CS, Moon JM, Bae JM, Choi EJ, Oh SH. Evaluation of Manufacturing Accuracy in Merlon Fracture Models Fabricated by Vat Photopolymerization 3D-Printing Technologies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2025;15(10):1-13. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/10/5595/htm
  32. Alrabeah G, Alamro N, Alghamdi A, Almslam A, Azaaqi M. Influences of luting cement shade on the color of various translucent monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics for veneer restorations. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023;15(5):238–47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37936834/
  33. Al-Akhali AARM, Al-Hamzi M, Al-Shami IZ, Al-Kholani AI, Madfa AA. Effect of khat extract on color stability of digitally and manually fabricated provisional restorations: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1-10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37773116/
  34. Oros D, Penčić M, Orošnjak M, Kedziora S. Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Their Applications in Dentistry: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2025 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Oct 23];15(15):8346. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/15/8346/htm
  35. Ganbold B, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Cho J. Human Stem Cell Responses and Surface Characteristics of 3D Printing Co-Cr Dental Material. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(20):1-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31635376/
  36. Metin DS, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Prause E, Ashurko I, Sarmadi BS, et al. Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2024;144(2024):1-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38513937/
  37. Jain S, Sayed ME, Shetty M, Alqahtani SM, Al Wadei MHD, Gupta SG, et al. Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2022 14(13):1-40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9269394/
  38. Pantea M, Ciocoiu RC, Greabu M, Totan AR, Imre M, Țâncu AMC, et al. Compressive and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed and Conventional Resins Designated for Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Comparison. Materials. 2022;15(9):1-22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9104158/
  39. Zhang G, Li J, Wang H, Shangguan C, Xie J, Zhou Y. Research on the Impact Toughness of 3D-Printed CoCrMo Alloy Components Based on Fractal Theory. Biomimetics. 2025;10(5):1-14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12108852/
  40. Bajt Leban M, Hren M, Kosec T. The microstructure, mechanical and electrochemical properties of 3D printed alloys with reusing powders. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1–16. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-28971-9
  41. Hong JH, Yeoh FY. Mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of cobalt-chrome alloy fabricated using additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc. 2020;29(2020):196–201. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785320341468
  42. Rouf S, Raina A, Irfan Ul Haq M, Naveed N, Jeganmohan S, Farzana Kichloo A. 3D printed parts and mechanical properties: Influencing parameters, sustainability aspects, global market scenario, challenges and applications. Adv Ind Eng Poly Res. 2022;5(3):143–58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254250482200001X
  43. Al-Fodeh RS, Al-Dwairi ZN, Almasri M, Baba NZ. Mechanical properties of 3D-printed resin denture teeth: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2024;(2024) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39210663/
  44. Chuchulska B, Dimitrova M, Vlahova A, Hristov I, Tomova Z, Kazakova R. Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility between CAD/CAM and Conventional Polymers Applied in Prosthetic Dentistry. Polymers. 2024;16(7):1-20. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/7/877/htm
  45. Ansarifard E, Farzin M, Parlack AZ, Taghva M, Zare R. Comparing Castability of Nickel-Chromium, Cobalt-Chromium, and Non-Precious Gold Color Alloys, Using two Different Casting Techniques. J Dent. 2022;23(1):7-12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8918635/
  46. Tomova Z, Vlahova A, Zlatev S, Stoeva I, Tomov D, Davcheva D, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance, Ion Release, and Biocompatibility of CoCr Alloy for Metal-Ceramic Restorations Produced by CAD/CAM Technologies. Dent J (Basel). 2023;11(7):1-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37504232/
  47. Tichá D, Tomášik J, Oravcová Ľ, Thurzo A. Three-Dimensionally-Printed Polymer and Composite Materials for Dental Applications with Focus on Orthodontics. Polymers. 2024;16(22):1-26. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/16/22/3151/htm
  48. Tian Y, Chen CX, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, et al. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning.2021;(2021):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
  49. Abad-Coronel C, Freire Bonilla C, Vidal S, Rosero F, Encalada Abad C, Mena Córdova N, et al. Evaluating a Novel 3D-Printed Resin for Dental Restorations: Fracture Resistance of Restorations Fabricated by Digital Press Stereolithography. Polymers. 2025;17(17):1-13. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/17/17/2322/htm
  50. Duarte S, Phark JH. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(1):257–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13371
  51. Jurado CA, Afrashtehfar KI, Hyer J, Alhotan A. Effect of sintering on the translucency of CAD–CAM lithium disilicate restorations: A comparative in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(9):861–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13644
  52. Alotaibi HN. Patient Satisfaction with CAD/CAM 3D-Printed Complete Dentures: A Systematic Analysis of the Clinical Studies. Healthcare (Switzerland). 2025;13(4):1-14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11855026/
  53. Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Fankhauser N, Naharro M, Maniewicz S, Müller F. CAD-CAM complete removable dental prostheses: A double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial evaluating milled and 3D-printed dentures. J Dent. 2021;115(2021):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103842
  54. Ahmed WM, Azhari AA, Sedayo L, Alhaid A, Alhandar R, Almalki A, et al. Mapping the Landscape of the Digital Workflow of Esthetic Veneers from Design to Cementation: A Systematic Review. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(2):1-20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10888163/
  55. Silva BP, Mahn Arteaga G, Mahn E. Predictable 3D guided adhesive bonding of porcelain veneers using 3D printed trays. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2021;33(5):692–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12795
  56. Alqutaibi AY, Alghauli MA, Aljohani MHA, Zafar MS. Advanced additive manufacturing in implant dentistry: 3D printing technologies, printable materials, current applications and future requirements. Bioprinting.;42(2024):e00356. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886624000289
  57. Alghauli MA, Alqutaibi AY, Wille S, Kern M. The physical-mechanical properties of 3D-printed versus conventional milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024;156(2024):1-22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124002339
  58. Alyami MH, Alyami MH. The Applications of 3D-Printing Technology in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Current Literature. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e68501. http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68501
  59. Keßler A, Montenbruck L, Schwendicke F, Lüchtenborg J, Kaisarly D. Narrative review of 3D-printed temporary and permanent dental resin restorations. Polym Test. 2025;151(2025):1-9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142941825002673
  60. Wu C jui. CAD/CAM Technology in Dentistry: A Comparative Analysis of Milling and 3D Printing Techniques. MedScien. 2025;1(3):1-9. https://lseee.net/index.php/ms/article/view/308
  61. Zandinejad A, Floriani F, Lin WS, Naimi-Akbar A. Clinical outcomes of milled, 3D-printed, and conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(8):736–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13859
  62. Yu F, Xiang F, Zhao J, Lin N, Sun Z, Zheng Y. Clinical outcomes of self-glazed zirconia veneers produced by 3D gel deposition: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1-17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11020188/
  63. Ballard DH, Mills P, Duszak R, Weisman JA, Rybicki FJ, Woodard PK. Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(8):1103–13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31542197/
  64. Popescu M, Perieanu VS, Burlibașa M, Vorovenci A, Malița MA, Petri DC, et al. Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Resin 3D Printing Protocols in Dental Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review. Prosthesis. 2025;7(4):1-17. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-1592/7/4/78/htm
  65. Borse P, Jain S, Bhasin N, Grover RK, Singh B, Longkumer P. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Stability of 3D-Printed, Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and Conventional Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Denture Base Materials: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2025;17(5):e85128. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.85128
  66. Unkovskiy A, Beuer F, Hey J, Bomze D, Schmidt F. 3D-Printed Ultra-Thin Non-Prep Lithium Disilicate Veneers: A Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(6):1311–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39888218/
  67. Sun J, Yu S, Wade-Zhu J, Wang Y, Qu H, Zhao S, et al. 3D printing of ceramic composite with biomimetic toughening design. Addit Manuf. 2022;58(2022):103027. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214860422004195
  68. Manicone PF, De Angelis P, Rella E, Damis G, D’addona A. Patient preference and clinical working time between digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):589–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.042
  69. Alghauli MA, Almuzaini SA, Aljohani R, Alqutaibi AY. Impact of 3D printing orientation on accuracy, properties, cost, and time efficiency of additively manufactured dental models: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1-16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11673669/
  70. Naveed N. Investigate the effects of process parameters on material properties and microstructural changes of 3D-printed specimens using fused deposition modelling (FDM). Materials Technology. 2021;36(5):317–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2020.1758475
  71. Liu PYL, Liou JJH, Huang SW. Exploring the Barriers to the Advancement of 3D Printing Technology. Mathematics. 2023;11(14):1-20. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3068/htm
  72. Luo R, Zhang T, Lin G, Tang Q, Fu Z, Cheng L. Application of Artificial Intelligence Models in Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthesis Restoration: A Systematic Review. Int DentJ.;75(6):1-10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653925031478
  73. Farhadi F, Barnes MR, Sugito HR, Sin JM, Henderson ER, Levy JJ. Applications of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery. Front Med Technol. 2022;4(2024):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.995526
  74. Kumar R, Sporn K, Ong J, Waisberg E, Paladugu P, Vaja S, et al. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Care: Advancements in Bone Care and Future Directions. Bioengineering. 2025;12(5):1-21. https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/5/513/htm
  75. Borthakur PP. The Role and Future Directions of 3D Printing in Custom Prosthetic Design. Eng Proc. 2025;81(1):1-20. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/81/1/10/htm
  76. Wu Y, Liu J, Kang L, Tian J, Zhang X, Hu J, et al. An overview of 3D printed metal implants in orthopedic applications: Present and future perspectives. Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e17718. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023049265
  77. Ali F, Kalva SN, Koc M. Advancements in 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review of materials consideration, post processing, applications, and challenges. Discov Mater. 2024;4(1):1–38. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43939-024-00115-4

Author

Volodymyr Kachmar

Boston, MA, USA

Identifiers

DOI: 10.33899/rdentj.v26i2.61641

Download this PDF file
##submission.supplementaryFiles##
pdf

Statistics

Copyright and Licensing
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.