In Vitro Assessment of Plant-Based 3D-Printed Resin for Dental Model Applications

Section: Research Paper
Issue
Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026): Volume 26 Issue 2
Pages
491-507

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to assess the mechanical properties (Flexural strength, Compression strength, and hardness) and accuracy (trueness and precision) of plant-based resin as dental models in relation to conventional resin.


Materials and Methods: Sixty specimens for mechanical properties (20 specimens for each test) evaluation and 20 dental models were fabricated using two types of 3D printing resins (plant-based and conventional) printed by an LCD 3D printer with 75 µm layer thickness and zero-degree printing orientation. The mechanical performance was assessed through flexural strength, compressive strength, and hardness testing. Dimensional accuracy was evaluated by digitally scanning the printed models with a lab scanner and analyzing the datasets using Geomagic Control X software.


Results: Descriptive analysis and an independent samples t-test were performed. The results show that the plant-based resin exhibited equivalent values to those of the conventional model resin for flexural strengths (49.81±3.47 MP, 48.41±4.14 MP respectively), compressive strengths (4127.39±1.1MP, 127.3±0.59 MP respectively), and hardness (70.68±0.49 and 70.72± 1.12 respectively). No statistically significant differences (p=0.105) were observed between the two resin types in terms of model trueness, whereas the plant-based resin demonstrated higher precision than the conventional resin (0.184±0.04 and 0.257± 0.09 mm, respectively).


Conclusion: Plant-based resins demonstrate mechanical and dimensional properties comparable to those of conventional 3D-printed model resin. Plant-based resin shows superior precision to conventional resin.

Keywords:

plant-based resin, 3D printed, dental model, accuracy, mechanical properties. eco-friendly resin

References

  1. Németh A, Vitai V, Czumbel ML, Szabó B, Varga G, Kerémi B, et al. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models – A network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2023;134:104532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104532
  2. Jin SJ, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of Dental Replica Models Using Photopolymer Materials in Additive Manufacturing: In Vitro Three-Dimensional Evaluation. Journal of Prosthodontics. Blackwell Publishing Inc.; 2019;28(2):e557–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12928
  3. Persson ASK, Odén A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: Virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater. 2009;25(7):929–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
  4. Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art — Is it disruptive or destructive? Dent Mater. 2020;36(1):9–24.
  5. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
  6. Jeong Y-G, Lee W-S, Lee K-B. Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method. J Adv Prosthodont. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics; 2018;10(3):245–51. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.245
  7. Lin C-H, Lin Y-M, Lai Y-L, Lee S-Y. Mechanical properties, accuracy, and cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):349–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.002
  8. Ding R, Du Y, Goncalves RB, Francis LF, Reineke TM. Sustainable near UV-curable acrylates based on natural phenolics for stereolithography 3D printing. Polym Chem. R. Soc. Chem. 2019;10(9):1067–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8py01652f
  9. Sun XS. Overview of plant polymers: resources, demands, and sustainability. In: Bio-Based Polymers and Composites. Burlington: Academic Press; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012763952-9/50002-2
  10. Skliutas E, Lebedevaite M, Kasetaite S, Rekštytė S, Lileikis S, Ostrauskaite J, et al. A Bio-Based Resin for a Multi-Scale Optical 3D Printing. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66618-1
  11. Amulya K, Katakojwala R, Ramakrishna S, Venkata Mohan S. Low carbon biodegradable polymer matrices for sustainable future. Composites Part C: Open Access. 2021;4:100111.
  12. Donmez MB, Erbil KR, Diken Tüksayar AA, Çakmak G, Yilmaz B. Trueness and stability of additively manufactured removable dies: An in vitro study on plant-based resins and alcohol-free cleaning solutions. J Prosthet Dent. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2026.03.007
  13. Pauls A, Hornberg A. Accuracy of soy-based resins for dental 3D printing. Angle Orthod; 2024;94(5):574–80. https://doi.org/10.2319/112523-779.1
  14. Dönmez MB, Diken Türksayar AA, Demirel M, Orgev A, Çakmak G, Dede DÖ, et al. Dimensional stability of maxillary casts made from plant-based resins and additively manufactured with different technologies. J Prosthet Dent.; 2025;134(3):841.e1-841.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.05.027
  15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Implants for surgery — Acrylic resin cements. 2nd ed. Vol. ISO 5833 Geneva, Switzerland; 2002
  16. International Organization for Standardization. Plastics — Determination of flexural properties [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. ISO 178:2019 Geneva, Switzerland; 2019
  17. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness [Internet]. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2003
  18. Revilla-León M, Cascos-Sánchez R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M. Influence of print orientation and wet-dry storage time on the intaglio accuracy of additively manufactured occlusal devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(6):1226–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.005
  19. de Camargo IL, Erbereli R, Fortulan CA. Additive manufacturing of electrofused mullite slurry by digital light processing. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2021;41(14):7182–8.DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.005
  20. Alammar A, Att W, Beuer F. The Accuracy of 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Restorations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2025;37(4):1047–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13365
  21. Ozden YE, Ozden I, Kayahan ZO, Kazazoglu E. The effect of storage conditions and duration on dimensional stability of 3D-printed endoguides. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):641. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-06008-z
  22. Lee Y, Wang S, Yan P, Zhao Y, Liu Y. Effect of storage temperature on the dimensional stability of DLP printed casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(2):331.e1-331.e7.
  23. Knode V, Ludwig B, Hamadeh S, Pandis N, Fleming PS. An in vitro comparison of the dimensional stability of four 3D-printed models under various storage conditions. Angle Orthod. Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists; 2024;94(3):346–52. https://doi.org/10.2319/081223-557.1
  24. Muhsin S. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Hardness and Accuracy of 3D-Printed DLP Model Resin Materials. JODR. Iraqi Association for Oral Research; 2023;10(3):11–9.
  25. ASTM International. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. Vol. ASTM D790–03 West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Internationa; 2003
  26. Fisher T, Almeida Jr JHS, Falzon BG, Kazancı Z. Tension and Compression Properties of 3D-Printed Composites: Print Orientation and Strain Rate Effects. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071708
  27. Al-Ameri A, Alothman OY, Alsadon O, Bangalore D. An In-Vitro Evaluation of Strength, Hardness, and Color Stability of Heat-Polymerized and 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymers After Aging. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(3).https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17030288
  28. Czajkowska M, Walejewska E, Zadrożny Ł, Wieczorek M, Święszkowski W, Wagner L, et al. Comparison of Dental Stone Models and Their 3D Printed Acrylic Replicas for the Accuracy and Mechanical Properties. Materials. 2020;13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184066
  29. Salgado H, Fialho J, Marques M, Vaz M, Figueiral MH, Mesquita P. Mechanical and surface properties of a 3D-printed dental resin reinforced with graphene. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentaria e Cirurgia Maxilofacial. Sociedade Portguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentaria; 2023;64(1):12–9.
  30. Metin DS, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Prause E, Ashurko I, Sarmadi BS, et al. Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2024;144:104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104960
  31. Li J, Mao Y, Yassine J, Henning N, Unkovskiy A, Beuer F, et al. The potential of PLA based dental models by material extrusion 3D printing: an in vitro study investigating mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025;36(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-025-06899-y
  32. Ashraf Mohamed Measar, Ammar Kh Al-Noori. A Comparison Between Virtual Models Obtained by Intraoral Scanner and Their Three Dimensionally Printed Models. Al-Rafidain Dental Journal. University of Mosul; 2023;23(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.33899/rdenj.2021.130918.1125
  33. Lourinho C, Salgado H, Correia A, Fonseca P. Mechanical Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate as Denture Base Material: Heat-Polymerized vs. 3D-Printed—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. Biomedicines. 2022;10(10).https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102565
  34. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dental Materials. 2018;34(2):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003
  35. Gaviolli E, Collares FM, Balbinot G de S, Leitune VCB. Optimizing Photoinitiator Concentration in 3D-Printed Resins for Provisional Dental Restorations. Braz Dent J. Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica; 2025;36. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256567
  36. Risteska S, Vasileski I, Gjorgjieska Angelovska E, Pižov A. Epoxy and Bio-Based Epoxy Glass Fiber Composites: Taguchi Design of Experiments and Future Applications. Journal of Composites Science. 2025;9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9100513
  37. Wang F, Wan C, Li H, Li Y, Hu F, Liao Y, et al. Development of fully bio-based eco-resin with integrated flame Retardancy, high flexibility, and degradability from vegetable oil-polysaccharide hybrid systems. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2025;523:168268.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.168268
  38. Li J, Mao Y, Yassine J, Henning N, Unkovskiy A, Beuer F, et al. The potential of PLA based dental models by material extrusion 3D printing: an in vitro study investigating mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025;36(1):https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-025-06899-y
  39. Bard S, Demleitner M, Weber R, Zeiler R, Altstädt V. Effect of Curing Agent on the Compressive Behavior at Elevated Test Temperature of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Polymers (Basel). 2019;11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11060943
  40. Jang H, Park G, Kwon S, Park S. Sebacic acid as a renewable monomer for biodegradable polyesters: A review. React Funct Polym. 2026;219:106577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2025.106577
  41. Perez B, Blanco N, Villaverde H, Echeverria O, de Miranda O, Rodriguez R. Direct Acrylation of Soybean Oil and the Influence of the Acrylation Degree on Waterborne Acrylic Systems. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162355
  42. Aktug Karademir S, Atasoy S, Akarsu S, Karaaslan E. Effects of post-curing conditions on degree of conversion, microhardness, and stainability of 3D printed permanent resins. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05664-5
  43. Unkovskiy A, Bui PH-B, Schille C, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Huettig F, Spintzyk S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dental Materials. 2018;34(12):e324–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.011
  44. Etemad-Shahidi Y, Qallandar OB, Evenden J, Alifui-Segbaya F, Ahmed KE. Accuracy of 3-Dimensionally Printed Full-Arch Dental Models: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103357
  45. Jin S-J, Kim D-Y, Kim J-H, Kim W-C. Accuracy of Dental Replica Models Using Photopolymer Materials in Additive Manufacturing: In Vitro Three-Dimensional Evaluation. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e557–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12928

Author

Mohammed M Sadoon

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

Identifiers

DOI: 10.33899/f6r86j32

Download this PDF file
##submission.supplementaryFiles##
pdf

Statistics

Copyright and Licensing
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.